Selecting Procedures for Determining Limits AB & BC
With every technique in the unit available, the work becomes choosing among them. The routine is fixed: substitute first, then branch on the result. A determinate number is the answer. A $\frac{0}{0}$ calls for a rewrite chosen by structure, factoring for polynomials, a conjugate for radicals, a common denominator for complex fractions. A nonzero over zero means unbounded behavior and no limit. A piecewise or absolute-value join calls for one-sided limits before anything else.
Three errors recur. Substituting and reporting whatever appears, so an unfinished $\frac{0}{0}$ becomes the answer. Treating that form as a value or as proof of failure, when most such limits resolve to a finite number. And applying a limit law whose hypotheses fail, most often splitting a quotient whose denominator tends to zero, or splitting a product one of whose factors has no limit at all.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Selecting Procedures for Determining Limits
›
A single decision routine for every limit in the unit: substitute, classify, then pick the rewrite the form calls for, with the hypothesis checks the limit laws require.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items spanning the three failure modes of this topic: reporting what substitution returned, misreading an indeterminate form, and applying a limit law whose hypotheses fail. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.