Mistake Master

Selecting Procedures for Determining Limits AB & BC

With every technique in the unit available, the work becomes choosing among them. The routine is fixed: substitute first, then branch on the result. A determinate number is the answer. A $\frac{0}{0}$ calls for a rewrite chosen by structure, factoring for polynomials, a conjugate for radicals, a common denominator for complex fractions. A nonzero over zero means unbounded behavior and no limit. A piecewise or absolute-value join calls for one-sided limits before anything else.

Three errors recur. Substituting and reporting whatever appears, so an unfinished $\frac{0}{0}$ becomes the answer. Treating that form as a value or as proof of failure, when most such limits resolve to a finite number. And applying a limit law whose hypotheses fail, most often splitting a quotient whose denominator tends to zero, or splitting a product one of whose factors has no limit at all.

SUBSTITUTE FIRST a number STOP 0 / 0 rewrite, then retry k / 0 no limit, asymptote polynomials factor a radical conjugate fraction in a fraction common denominator before all of it: a piecewise or absolute-value join means take BOTH one-sided limits a product with a bounded but limitless factor means squeeze it
The branch is chosen by what substitution returns, not by how the expression looks.
SUBSTITUTE FIRST FACTOR FIRST, OUT OF HABIT lim (x² − 9)/(x − 1) at x = 4 same limit → 7/3, done factor top: (x−3)(x+3) nothing cancels then substitute anyway most limits are determinate; substituting first is what tells you so
Same answer, very different cost. Substitution is the cheapest way to classify the problem.

The work

3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Selecting Procedures for Determining Limits

A single decision routine for every limit in the unit: substitute, classify, then pick the rewrite the form calls for, with the hypothesis checks the limit laws require.

Skill check · 10 scenarios
Diagnostic
10-item topic check

Ten items spanning the three failure modes of this topic: reporting what substitution returned, misreading an indeterminate form, and applying a limit law whose hypotheses fail. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.

Not yet available · 10 items
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception

Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.

Take the diagnostic to identify your misconceptions