Connecting Limits at Infinity and Horizontal Asymptotes AB & BC
A limit at infinity describes end behavior, and a finite one is a horizontal asymptote. For rational functions the answer follows from comparing degrees: the limit is 0 when the numerator's degree is smaller, the ratio of leading coefficients when the degrees match, and unbounded when the numerator's is larger. The underlying method is to divide numerator and denominator by the highest power in the denominator, after which every remaining term with $x$ underneath tends to zero.
Two errors dominate. The degree rules get applied from memory without checking which case is in play, most often dividing leading coefficients when the degrees are not equal, and a graph gets rejected for crossing its horizontal asymptote, which is perfectly legal since the asymptote only describes far-out behavior. Separately, the limit laws get pushed past their hypotheses: $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$ and $\infty - \infty$ are indeterminate and need real work, and the two ends must be computed separately whenever an even root or absolute value is present.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Connecting Limits at Infinity and Horizontal Asymptotes
›
The three degree cases with the divide-by-the-highest-power reasoning behind them, why crossing a horizontal asymptote is legal, and why the two ends must be computed separately.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items spanning the two failure modes of this topic: applying the degree rules without checking the case, and pushing the limit laws past their hypotheses at infinity. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.