Mistake Master

Determining Limits Using Algebraic Properties of Limits AB & BC

When $\lim_{x\to a} f(x)$ and $\lim_{x\to a} g(x)$ both exist, limits distribute over sums, differences, products, constant multiples, powers, and roots, and over quotients as long as the denominator's limit is not zero. Applying these repeatedly shows that for polynomials, and for rational functions where the denominator does not vanish, the limit is just $f(a)$. That is why direct substitution is valid: it is a theorem about continuous functions, not a shortcut.

Two errors dominate. The first is applying a law whose hypotheses fail, most often the quotient law when the denominator's limit is zero, or splitting an expression such as $\frac{\sin x}{x}$ whose limit exists only as a whole. The laws also do not run backwards: two functions with no limits can sum to one that has a limit. The second is substituting and reporting whatever appears without classifying it, so a $\frac{0}{0}$ gets called "does not exist" when it is an unfinished calculation, and a nonzero over zero gets called 0 when it signals an asymptote.

substitute x = a a number that IS the limit done 0 / 0 indeterminate factor / rationalize k / 0, k ≠ 0 unbounded asymptote, no limit calling the middle box "does not exist" reports an unfinished calculation calling the right box "0" reads a zero denominator as making the fraction small
Substitution is step one, not the answer. Which box you land in decides what happens next.
THE LAWS DO NOT RUN BACKWARDS 1/x has no limit at 0 -1/x has no limit at 0 but their sum is 0 everywhere, so its limit is 0 AND CANNOT ALWAYS BE SPLIT lim sin(x)/x = 1 but (lim sin x)/(lim x) = 0/0 the whole can behave when the parts do not, which is why the hypotheses sit on the parts
Both directions fail. The hypotheses are stated on the pieces for exactly this reason.

The work

3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Determining Limits Using Algebraic Properties of Limits

States each limit law with the hypothesis that makes it valid, derives direct substitution from them, and drills the three things substitution can return.

Skill check · 10 scenarios
Diagnostic
10-item topic check

Ten items spanning the two failure modes of this topic: applying a limit law whose hypotheses fail, and substituting without classifying what came back. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.

Not yet available · 10 items
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception

Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.

Take the diagnostic to identify your misconceptions