Reasoning Using Slope Fields AB & BC
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optionalA solution curve follows the field: it starts at the given point, runs in both directions, and stays tangent to every segment it passes, so a curve cutting across a segment is wrong rather than imprecise. Where $f(x, y)$ vanishes along a whole horizontal line, the constant function there is an equilibrium solution; $\frac{dy}{dx} = y(2 - y)$ has two, at $y = 0$ and $y = 2$, with solutions rising between them, falling above $y = 2$ and falling away below $y = 0$.
For every equation in this course two distinct solution curves never touch, because the point of contact would carry two different solutions through it, which a smoothness condition on the right side rules out. An equilibrium line is therefore a barrier: a solution starting below $y = 2$ stays below it for all time and approaches it without reaching it. The same fact appears algebraically when both sides are divided by a variable expression, which is legal only where that expression is nonzero: separating $\frac{dy}{dx} = y^{2}$ produces $y = -\frac{1}{x + C}$ and discards the constant solution $y = 0$, which no value of $C$ recovers.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Reasoning Using Slope Fields
›
Sketches particular solution curves through a slope field in both directions from the initial point, identifies attracting and repelling equilibrium solutions, and shows why no curve crosses one, then connects that barrier to the algebraic division that quietly discards the constant solution.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on reasoning from a field: sketching through the given point without contradicting the segments, locating equilibrium solutions and their stability, determining long-run behaviour, and recovering the constant solution that dividing by a variable removes.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.