Approximating Solutions Using Euler’s Method BC only
Euler's method chains tangent lines: from $(x_{n}, y_{n})$ the equation gives a slope, and $y_{n+1} = y_{n} + h \cdot f(x_{n}, y_{n})$ with $x_{n+1} = x_{n} + h$. For $\frac{dy}{dx} = x + y$ with $y(0) = 1$ and $h = 0.5$, the slope at $(0, 1)$ is $1$ so $y = 1.5$ at $x = 0.5$; the slope there is $2$ so $y = 2.5$ at $x = 1$. The step size is given directly or as $h = \frac{b - a}{n}$ for $n$ equal steps, it is negative when the target lies to the left, and the count matters as much as the size.
The slope must be recomputed at every new point using both updated coordinates; reusing the first slope turns the polygon into one long tangent line and gives $2$ rather than $2.5$ in the example above. Because each step follows a tangent, Euler's method underestimates where the solution is concave up and overestimates where it is concave down: here $\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}} = 1 + x + y$ is positive, and the estimate $2.5$ falls short of the exact $2e - 2 \approx 3.437$. A smaller step is more accurate, and the error accumulates across steps.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Approximating Solutions Using Euler’s Method
›
Builds the Euler recursion from one tangent-line step and runs it twice in a table, fixes the step size from an interval and a step count including the backwards case, insists the slope be recomputed with both updated coordinates, and uses concavity to predict whether the estimate is high or low.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on Euler's method: computing the step size and counting the steps, stepping in the correct direction, recomputing the slope at every new point rather than reusing the first, and deciding from concavity whether the approximation is an over- or underestimate.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.