Mistake Master

Approximating Solutions Using Euler’s Method BC only

Euler's method chains tangent lines: from $(x_{n}, y_{n})$ the equation gives a slope, and $y_{n+1} = y_{n} + h \cdot f(x_{n}, y_{n})$ with $x_{n+1} = x_{n} + h$. For $\frac{dy}{dx} = x + y$ with $y(0) = 1$ and $h = 0.5$, the slope at $(0, 1)$ is $1$ so $y = 1.5$ at $x = 0.5$; the slope there is $2$ so $y = 2.5$ at $x = 1$. The step size is given directly or as $h = \frac{b - a}{n}$ for $n$ equal steps, it is negative when the target lies to the left, and the count matters as much as the size.

The slope must be recomputed at every new point using both updated coordinates; reusing the first slope turns the polygon into one long tangent line and gives $2$ rather than $2.5$ in the example above. Because each step follows a tangent, Euler's method underestimates where the solution is concave up and overestimates where it is concave down: here $\frac{d^{2}y}{dx^{2}} = 1 + x + y$ is positive, and the estimate $2.5$ falls short of the exact $2e - 2 \approx 3.437$. A smaller step is more accurate, and the error accumulates across steps.

dy/dx = x + y, y(0) = 1, STEP SIZE h = 0.5, TARGET x = 1 POINT SLOPE x + y CHANGE h · SLOPE NEW POINT (0, 1) 0 + 1 = 1 0.5 · 1 = 0.5 (0.5, 1.5) (0.5, 1.5) 0.5 + 1.5 = 2 0.5 · 2 = 1 (1, 2.5) THE SECOND SLOPE IS 2, NOT 1. IT IS COMPUTED AT THE NEW POINT. REUSING THE FIRST SLOPE GIVES 1 + 1(1) = 2, WHICH IS THE TANGENT LINE. APPROXIMATION AT x = 1: 2.5 EXACT VALUE: 2e − 2 ≈ 3.437 THE ESTIMATE IS LOW BECAUSE THE SOLUTION IS CONCAVE UP HERE. A TABLE MAKES A MISSING STEP VISIBLE. RUNNING ARITHMETIC DOES NOT.
Two rows, four columns, and the whole method. The row that matters most is the second one, where the slope is recomputed at $(0.5,\, 1.5)$ rather than carried over from the row above.
EXACT SOLUTION AGAINST THE TWO-STEP EULER POLYGON. EXACT: y = 2e^x − x − 1 EULER, h = 0.5 GAP AT x = 1 3.437 − 2.5 = 0.937 0 0.5 1 EVERY TANGENT TO A CONCAVE UP CURVE LIES UNDER IT, SO EULER FALLS SHORT.
Drawn at $340$ px per unit across and $70$ px per unit up, so the two axes are on different scales and the steepness on the page is not the slope. The gap widens with each step because every step starts from a point that is already low.

The work

3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Approximating Solutions Using Euler’s Method

Builds the Euler recursion from one tangent-line step and runs it twice in a table, fixes the step size from an interval and a step count including the backwards case, insists the slope be recomputed with both updated coordinates, and uses concavity to predict whether the estimate is high or low.

Skill check · 10 scenarios
Diagnostic
10-item topic check

Ten items on Euler's method: computing the step size and counting the steps, stepping in the correct direction, recomputing the slope at every new point rather than reusing the first, and deciding from concavity whether the approximation is an over- or underestimate.

Not yet available · 10 items
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception

Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.

Take the diagnostic to identify your misconceptions