Evaluating Improper Integrals BC only
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optionalAn integral is improper when the interval is infinite or the integrand is unbounded on it, and both cases are handled by replacing the offending endpoint with a variable and taking a limit: $\int_{1}^{\infty} f = \lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{1}^{b} f$. If that limit is a finite number the integral converges to it, and otherwise it diverges. The limit notation is not a formality, since $F(\infty) - F(1)$ substitutes a symbol that is not a number, and it carries its own mark on a free-response question.
The integrand tending to zero is necessary and not sufficient: $\int_{1}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{x}$ diverges while $\int_{1}^{\infty}\frac{dx}{x^{2}} = 1$. The p-test says $\int_{1}^{\infty}x^{-p}dx$ converges exactly when $p > 1$ and $\int_{0}^{1}x^{-p}dx$ exactly when $p < 1$, the two halves pointing opposite ways because a slow tail and a steep spike are opposite dangers. A discontinuity strictly inside the interval announces itself nowhere in the notation: $\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{dx}{x^{2}}$ evaluates to $-2$ if handled carelessly, which is negative for a positive integrand. Split at the bad point and require both pieces to converge.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Evaluating Improper Integrals
›
Separates the two ways an integral becomes improper and rewrites each as a limit before any substitution, contrasts one over x with one over x squared to show that falling to zero is not enough, states the p-test with its two halves pointing opposite ways, and splits at a discontinuity inside the interval where careless evaluation returns a negative number for a positive integrand.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on evaluating improper integrals: substituting infinity or a point of discontinuity into an antiderivative instead of taking a limit, missing a blow-up strictly inside the interval, and reading convergence off the shape of the integrand rather than from the limit.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.