Mistake Master

Ratio Test for Convergence BC only

With $L = \lim \left|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}\right|$, the series converges absolutely when $L < 1$, diverges when $L > 1$ or $L = \infty$, and is undecided when $L = 1$. The mechanism is comparison with a geometric series of ratio $L$, which is why the undecided case sits exactly at the endpoint 10.2 excluded: at $r = 1$ the comparison series neither shrinks nor grows, and everything then depends on how the ratio approaches $1$, which the limit has discarded. That $L = 1$ genuinely decides nothing is provable rather than cautionary, since $\sum \frac{1}{n}$ gives $\frac{n}{n+1} \to 1$ and diverges while $\sum \frac{1}{n^{2}}$ gives $\left(\frac{n}{n+1}\right)^{2} \to 1$ and converges.

Every $p$-series gives $L = 1$, so the test is blind to that whole family, which makes a bare power of $n$ in the denominator a reason to choose a different test rather than a hard case for this one. What the ratio test is built for is factorials, where $\frac{(n+1)!}{n!} = n+1$, and constants raised to the $n$, where the ratio collapses to that constant: $\sum \frac{2^{n}}{n!}$ gives $\frac{2}{n+1} \to 0$, $\sum \frac{n!}{2^{n}}$ gives $\frac{n+1}{2} \to \infty$, and $\sum \frac{n!}{n^{n}}$ gives $\left(\frac{n}{n+1}\right)^{n} \to \frac{1}{e}$, which no other test in the unit reaches. Because $L$ is defined on absolute values, a successful ratio test proves absolute convergence, the stronger conclusion 10.9 develops and the reason this is the standard tool for the radius of convergence in 10.13.

THE LIMIT OF THE RATIO, L. THREE CASES, NOT TWO. CONVERGES DIVERGES 0 2 L = 1 NO CONCLUSION THE MIDDLE CASE IS A SINGLE POINT, AND IT IS NOT A SIDE.
Drawn to scale at $200$ px per unit of $L$. The undecided case is drawn as a point rather than a band on purpose: it is not a third region between the other two but the single value where the geometric comparison degenerates, which is why it cannot be assigned to either side.
FIVE RATIOS. THE LAST TWO SHARE A VALUE AND NOT A FATE. THE SERIES THE RATIO L VERDICT SUM OF 2^n/n! 2/(n+1) 0 CONVERGES SUM OF n!/n^n (n/(n+1))^n 1/e CONVERGES SUM OF n!/2^n (n+1)/2 DIVERGES SUM OF 1/n n/(n+1) 1 DIVERGES ANYWAY SUM OF 1/n² (n/(n+1))² 1 CONVERGES ANYWAY ONE RATIO CANNOT PREDICT TWO DIFFERENT OUTCOMES.
The final two rows are a proof, not an illustration: both produce $L = 1$ and their verdicts disagree, so no rule assigning a verdict to $L = 1$ could be correct about both. Every $p$-series lands in those rows, since $\left(\frac{n}{n+1}\right)^{p} \to 1$ for every $p$.

The work

3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Ratio Test for Convergence

Sets out the three cases of the ratio test and shows the middle one is empty rather than negative, proving it by exhibiting two series with the same ratio limit and opposite verdicts. Explains why factorials and constants raised to the nth power are what the test is for, and why every p-series is invisible to it.

Skill check · 10 scenarios
Diagnostic
10-item topic check

Ten items on the ratio test: computing the limit of the ratio, treating the value one as no information rather than as divergence, recognising the series shapes the test handles well, and choosing another test when it returns nothing.

Not yet available · 10 items
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception

Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.

Take the diagnostic to identify your misconceptions