Mistake Master

Alternating Series Test for Convergence BC only

For $\sum(-1)^{n+1}b_n$ with $b_n > 0$, convergence follows from two conditions: the $b_n$ are eventually decreasing and they tend to zero. Both are needed and they differ, since a sequence can tend to zero while rising at every other step. The mechanism is a squeeze: each partial sum steps forward by $b_n$ and back by $b_{n+1} \le b_n$, so the odd partial sums fall, the even ones rise, every odd one stays above every even one, and the gap between consecutive partial sums is exactly $b_n \to 0$. The decrease makes the squeeze and the limit closes it.

With $b_n = \frac{1}{n}$ this gives the alternating harmonic series converging to $\ln 2 \approx 0.6931$, while $\sum \frac{1}{n}$ diverges: the same terms, differing only in sign, with a finite sum in one arrangement and none in the other. A series that converges while its absolute values do not is conditionally convergent, and one whose absolute values converge too is absolutely convergent, the distinction 10.9 develops. The test certifies only the alternating series, says nothing about $\sum|a_n|$, gives no value, and does not prove divergence when it fails to apply, though it does supply the error bound of 10.10. The decrease condition is checked by inspection, by ratio, or by derivative, and only needs to hold eventually, while irregular sign changes such as $\frac{\cos n}{n}$ are outside the test entirely.

PARTIAL SUMS OF 1 − 1/2 + 1/3 − 1/4 + ..., n = 1 TO 10. ODD SUMS SIT ABOVE THE LIMIT ln 2 = 0.6931 EVEN SUMS SIT BELOW IT THE GAP IS THE NEXT TERM, 1/n n = 1 n = 10 THE SAME TERMS WITHOUT SIGNS DIVERGE. THE ALTERNATION IS THE REASON.
Drawn to scale at $180$ px per unit vertically and $36$ px per term horizontally, every partial sum computed exactly. The zigzag straddles $\ln 2$ with the odd sums above and the even sums below, and the vertical gap between consecutive vertices is exactly the next term, which is why stopping anywhere leaves an error smaller than the term omitted.
BOTH CONDITIONS, CHECKED SEPARATELY. bn DECREASING bn → 0 VERDICT 1/n YES YES CONVERGES n/(n+1) NO, IT RISES NO, → 1 DIVERGES ln(n)/n AFTER n = 2 YES CONVERGES 1/n² YES YES CONVERGES 1/2, 1, 1/4, 1/3, ... NO YES TEST SILENT THE LAST ROW PASSES ONE CONDITION AND FAILS THE OTHER.
The last row is why the two conditions are stated separately: those terms tend to zero and never settle into a decrease, so the test has nothing to say. Row three shows the decrease only has to begin somewhere, and row two fails both at once, which makes it a divergence by the nth term test rather than a silence.

The work

3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Alternating Series Test for Convergence

States both conditions of the alternating series test and shows that they are different requirements, explains the squeeze that makes the test work, and uses the alternating harmonic series converging to the natural logarithm of two to introduce convergence that depends entirely on the signs.

Skill check · 10 scenarios
Diagnostic
10-item topic check

Ten items on the alternating series test: checking that the absolute values decrease as well as vanish, recognising that a failed test is not a proof of divergence, and separating what the test certifies from what it says about the series of absolute values.

Not yet available · 10 items
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception

Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears the misconception and moves you to the next.

Take the diagnostic to identify your misconceptions