Mistake Master
Differentiating an area AB & BC
Let the upper limit of a definite integral move, and the integral stops being a number and starts being a function. The Fundamental Theorem says what its derivative is, and the statement is almost insultingly short: you get the integrand back. Everything difficult here is what happens when the upper limit is not simply $x$.
§1
An integral with a moving edge.
▸
Fix a starting point $a$ and let the finish line move. Define
$$g(x) = \int_{a}^{x} f(t)\,dt.$$
For each $x$ this is a number, the signed area collected from $a$ up to $x$, so $g$ is a genuine function of $x$. Three readings of the notation to settle before anything else.
- The letter inside is not the letter outside. The $t$ is the dummy variable being integrated away; the $x$ is the input to $g$. Writing $\int_{a}^{x} f(x)\,dx$ uses one letter for two jobs and makes the expression unreadable, which is why the convention exists.
- $g(a) = 0$. An interval of zero width collects zero area, whatever $f$ is doing at $a$.
- $g$ can be negative. It is a signed area, so it falls wherever $f$ is below the axis.
Now push the finish line a little further, from $x$ to $x + h$. The extra area is a thin strip of width $h$ whose height is about $f(x)$, so $g(x + h) - g(x) \approx f(x)\,h$. Divide by $h$ and let $h \to 0$:
$$g'(x) = f(x).$$
That is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1: if $f$ is continuous, then $g(x) = \int_{a}^{x} f(t)\,dt$ is differentiable and its derivative is $f$ itself. Accumulating and differentiating undo each other, which is the sentence the entire unit exists to establish.
The starting point $a$ has vanished from the conclusion, and that is not an oversight. Moving $a$ shifts every value of $g$ by the same constant, and a constant shift does not change a derivative.
§2
When the upper limit is a function.
▸
Replace the upper limit $x$ by a function $u(x)$. Now two things move: $x$ moves, and the finish line moves at its own speed, $u'(x)$. The chain rule handles it exactly as it handles any composition:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\int_{a}^{u(x)} f(t)\,dt = f\!\left(u(x)\right)\cdot u'(x).$$
Read the two factors. The height of the new sliver is $f$ evaluated at the finish line, which is $u(x)$ and not $x$. The width of the new sliver is how fast that finish line is travelling, which is $u'(x)$.
So $\frac{d}{dx}\int_{0}^{x^{2}} f(t)\,dt = f(x^{2})\cdot 2x$. When $x$ increases by a little, the upper limit increases by about $2x$ times as much, and the area grows correspondingly faster.
Two observations that make the omission easy to spot.
- The plain case is the special case. With $u(x) = x$ the factor is $u'(x) = 1$, which is why $g'(x) = f(x)$ looks like it has no chain rule in it. It has one; it is invisible.
- Check by units or by size. An answer of $f(x^{2})$ alone says the area grows at the same rate whether the finish line is crawling or sprinting, which cannot be right.
§3
A lower limit that moves.
▸
Suppose the variable is at the bottom instead:
$$h(x) = \int_{x}^{b} f(t)\,dt.$$
Pushing $x$ to the right removes area from the left end of the region, so $h$ decreases where $f$ is positive. Reversing the limits makes that precise, using the property Topic 6.6 states in general:
$$h(x) = -\int_{b}^{x} f(t)\,dt \quad\implies\quad h'(x) = -f(x).$$
With a function in the lower slot, both adjustments apply at once:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\int_{v(x)}^{b} f(t)\,dt = -f\!\left(v(x)\right)\cdot v'(x).$$
And if both limits move, the integral splits at any convenient fixed point $c$, which turns it into two problems of the kind already solved:
$$\frac{d}{dx}\int_{v(x)}^{u(x)} f(t)\,dt = f\!\left(u(x)\right)u'(x) - f\!\left(v(x)\right)v'(x).$$
The upper limit contributes and the lower limit takes away, with each carrying its own chain-rule factor. A single term is the giveaway that one of the two moving edges was not noticed.
§4
What the theorem is for.
▸
Part 1 says every continuous function has an antiderivative, and hands one over: $\int_{a}^{x} f(t)\,dt$ is a function whose derivative is $f$. That matters even when the antiderivative has no formula. $\int_{0}^{x} e^{-t^{2}}\,dt$ cannot be written with elementary functions, and Part 1 still tells you its derivative exactly: $e^{-x^{2}}$.
Practically, it turns questions about $g$ into questions about $f$, which you can see on a graph:
- $g$ is increasing where $f$ is positive, since $g' = f$.
- $g$ has a critical point where $f$ crosses the axis.
- $g$ is concave up where $f$ is increasing, since $g'' = f'$.
Every increasing, concave and inflection question from Unit 5 comes back here one level down, with $f$ playing the role that $f'$ played there. Topic 6.5 is entirely about reading those off a graph, so the vocabulary is worth re-anchoring now rather than rebuilding later.
One thing Part 1 does not do: it does not evaluate anything. Getting a number out of $\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\,dt$ is Part 2, in Topic 6.7, and it runs the other way, from an antiderivative to a value.
§5
Skill Check.
▸
Ten scenarios. Pick the chips that match your answer, then check. A scenario marks complete the first time every part is right. Progress saves on this device.