Mistake Master
Two symbols, one object AB & BC
A Riemann sum is a list of products added up, and a definite integral is what that list becomes when the rectangles get infinitely thin. Both get written in compressed notation, and the compression is where the marks go: a misread index bound and a mis-built sum are the same error, seen once in symbols and once in arithmetic.
§1
Every part of a sigma has a job.
▸
The expression
$$\sum_{i=1}^{4} (3i - 1)$$
says: run $i$ through $1, 2, 3, 4$, evaluate $3i - 1$ each time, and add the four results. That is $2 + 5 + 8 + 11 = 26$. Four parts, four jobs:
- The index $i$ is a counter. It takes whole-number values only, and it does not appear in the answer.
- The lower bound says where the count starts. Starting at $0$ instead of $1$ adds a whole extra term.
- The upper bound says where it stops, and the stop is inclusive.
- The term is a formula in $i$, evaluated fresh at each value.
Two counting facts follow, and both get lost. A sum from $i = 1$ to $i = n$ has $n$ terms. A sum from $i = 2$ to $i = 5$ has $5 - 2 + 1 = 4$ terms, not $3$: subtracting the bounds counts gaps, and terms are one more than gaps.
Anything not carrying the index is a constant as far as the sum is concerned, so it can be pulled out front: $\sum_{i=1}^{n} c \cdot a_i = c\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i$. This is what lets $\Delta x$ leave the sum when every rectangle has the same width, and it is exactly why an unequal-width sum cannot be written that way.
§2
A Riemann sum, written once for all n.
▸
Put the pieces of Topic 6.2 into that notation. On $[a, b]$ with $n$ equal subintervals,
$$\Delta x = \frac{b - a}{n}, \qquad x_i = a + i\,\Delta x = a + i\,\frac{b - a}{n},$$
and the right Riemann sum is
$$R_n = \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i)\,\Delta x = \sum_{i=1}^{n} f\!\left(a + i\,\frac{b-a}{n}\right)\frac{b-a}{n}.$$
On $[1, 3]$ that reads $\sum_{i=1}^{n} f\!\left(1 + \frac{2i}{n}\right)\frac{2}{n}$. The $\frac{2}{n}$ appears twice and means two different things: once it is the width of a rectangle, and once it is the spacing between sample points. They are the same number because the subintervals are equal.
Three places this goes wrong.
- Dropping the $a$. Writing $f\!\left(\frac{2i}{n}\right)$ samples from $[0, 2]$ instead of $[1, 3]$. The sample point starts at the left end of the interval and walks right; it does not start at zero.
- Running the index from $0$. Starting at $i = 0$ makes it a left sum, since $x_0 = a$. That is a legitimate sum, and it is a different one.
- Losing $\Delta x$. Without it the expression totals heights, which is not an area and has the wrong units.
§3
Let n run, and the symbol changes.
▸
More rectangles means thinner rectangles and a closer fit. If the limit exists as $n \to \infty$, and it does for every continuous function on a closed interval, that limit is the definite integral:
$$\int_{a}^{b} f(x)\,dx = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i)\,\Delta x.$$
The notation is designed to remind you of the sum. The $\int$ is an elongated S for sum, $f(x)$ is the height, and $dx$ is what the width $\Delta x$ became. Whether the sample points are left, right or midpoints stops mattering in the limit, which is why the definition does not name one.
Reading a given limit backwards into an integral is a standard exam question, and it is a matching exercise on three items:
- The factor that plays $\Delta x$ tells you $\frac{b - a}{n}$, and so the length of the interval.
- The expression inside $f$ tells you the left endpoint: whatever constant sits beside the $i$ term is $a$.
- Then $b = a + (\text{length})$, and $f$ is whatever the expression does to its argument.
For $\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{3}{n}\left(1 + \frac{3i}{n}\right)^{2}$: the width is $\frac{3}{n}$, so the interval has length $3$; the sample point is $1 + \frac{3i}{n}$, so $a = 1$ and $b = 4$; and the function squares its argument. The limit is $\int_{1}^{4} x^{2}\,dx$.
§4
Reading the integral sign back.
▸
Four things about $\int_{a}^{b} f(x)\,dx$ are worth saying explicitly, because each one is a mark somewhere.
- It is a number. Not a function, not a family of functions. $\int_{1}^{4} x^{2}\,dx = 21$, and there is nothing left to substitute into.
- The variable is a placeholder. $\int_{0}^{2} f(x)\,dx$ and $\int_{0}^{2} f(t)\,dt$ are the same number, because the letter is consumed by the integration. That is why the variable is called a dummy, and it is what makes Topic 6.4's accumulation functions readable.
- $a$ and $b$ are inputs. $\int_{2}^{7} f(x)\,dx$ integrates from $x = 2$ to $x = 7$. The $2$ is a place on the horizontal axis, not a value of $f$, and the integral is not "starting at a height of $2$".
- The $dx$ is not decoration. It names which variable is being integrated, which matters the moment a second letter appears, and it carries the width that gives the answer its units.
The notation for an indefinite integral, $\int f(x)\,dx$ with no limits, looks almost identical and means something categorically different: a family of functions rather than a number. Topic 6.8 takes that up. For now, notice that the limits are the entire difference, and that a stray pair of them, or a missing pair, changes what kind of object you have written down.
§5
Skill Check.
▸
Ten scenarios. Pick the chips that match your answer, then check. A scenario marks complete the first time every part is right. Progress saves on this device.