Graphical Representations of Summary Statistics for One Quantitative Variable
A boxplot draws the five-number summary to scale: a box from $Q_1$ to $Q_3$ cut at the median, whiskers to the most extreme values inside the 1.5 IQR fences, and a separate dot for each outlier beyond them. Because quartiles are percentile cuts, each of the four regions holds about a quarter of the data, so a region's length reports how far that quarter had to spread, not how many values it contains. A long upper region with the median low in the box signals right skew, and in skewed data the undrawn mean is usually found on the tail side of the median.
The traps are two families. Misreading the picture: taking the longest region for the most data, the box for "most of the data", the median line for the mean, or two matching boxplots as proof of matching shapes, when five numbers cannot show modes, gaps, or sample size. And mangling the mechanics underneath: whiskers drawn to the raw maximum past a genuine outlier, whiskers ended at the fence instead of at a data value, or quartiles and fences computed with $+1.5$ in place of $+1.5 \times \text{IQR}$.
The work
Lesson live · diagnostic and drills coming soon
Lesson
Graphical Representations of Summary Statistics for One Quantitative Variable
›
Builds boxplots from computed five-number summaries, drills the quarter-per-region rule that makes long mean sparse rather than crowded, handles outlier whiskers correctly, and maps what five numbers can never show.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on reading and building boxplots: regions mistaken for amounts of data, whiskers drawn past outliers or ended at fences, the median line taken for the mean, and matching boxplots taken for matching shapes. Take it cold to find your misread, or after the lesson to confirm there is none.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.