Summary Statistics for One Quantitative Variable
One quantitative variable gets two families of summaries. For center, the mean $\bar{x}$ balances all the values while the median simply takes the middle one, and the difference matters the moment the data are skewed: an outlier or a long tail drags the mean and barely touches the median, which is why the median is called resistant. For spread, the standard deviation $s$ reads as the typical distance of values from their mean, and the IQR, $Q_3 - Q_1$, is the width of the middle 50% of the ordered data. The 1.5 IQR rule ($1.5 \times \text{IQR}$ beyond a quartile) and the 2 SD rule ($\bar{x} \pm 2s$) turn "unusually far out" into a computed fence.
The traps are specific. Treating the mean as if it resisted outliers, or expecting mean and median to agree in skewed data, picks the wrong summary and defends it. Misreading the standard deviation as a range, as a bound every value must obey, or as a number that is large or small without units, replaces its actual meaning: typical distance from the mean. And the IQR gets mangled mechanically: reported as an interval instead of a distance, quartiles computed with the median counted into both halves, or fences placed at $Q_3 + 1.5$ with the IQR forgotten entirely.
The work
Lesson live · diagnostic and drills coming soon
Lesson
Summary Statistics for One Quantitative Variable
›
Builds the mean, median, standard deviation, quartiles, and IQR from small data sets, shows which summaries resist outliers and which get dragged, and drills the 1.5 IQR and 2 SD outlier fences.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items across the three failure modes of this topic: trusting the mean to resist an outlier, misreading the standard deviation as a range or a bound, and mangling quartile and IQR mechanics. Take it cold to find yours, or after the lesson to confirm the repairs.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.