Constructing a Confidence Interval for a Population Mean or Population Mean Difference
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optionalA one-sample t interval is $\bar{x} \pm t^{*}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}$ with $df = n - 1$. For 25 batteries with $\bar{x} = 124.6$ and $s = 9.2$: $SE = 1.84$, $t^{*} = 2.064$ at 95%, and the interval is about $(120.8, 128.4)$ hours. The conditions are random selection, the 10% condition, and a shape check that is either $n \ge 30$, a stated normal population, or a plot of the sample showing no strong skew or outliers. Paired data collapses first: compute one difference per pair, then run the same interval on those differences with $df$ equal to the number of pairs minus one.
$z^{*} = 1.96$ gets used where $t^{*} = 2.064$ belongs, producing an interval too narrow for its stated confidence, and $df$ gets read at $n$ instead of $n - 1$. The design gets misread, so 12 before-and-after measurements on the same students run as two samples with 22 degrees of freedom instead of one sample of 12 differences with 11. And the referent slips: an interval for $\mu$ reported as a range holding 95% of individual batteries, whose spread of 9.2 hours would make such a range several times wider, or as a probability statement about a parameter that is simply in or out.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Constructing a Confidence Interval for a Population Mean or Population Mean Difference
›
Builds the one-sample t interval with its critical value at n minus 1 degrees of freedom, checks the shape condition from a plot rather than a rule, collapses paired designs into a single sample of differences, and fixes the sentence that names the population mean.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on t intervals for a mean: z critical values, df read at n, paired data run as two samples, and intervals reported as ranges for individuals or for future sample means. Take it cold to find your habit, or after the lesson to check it is gone.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.