Mistake Master
Student view — seeing the site as a student does

p-Values

▶︎  Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optional ⚙︎  Open the appletp-Value Lab · five numbers this sample produces, and only one of them is the p-value

The p-value is the probability, computed assuming the null hypothesis is true, of getting a statistic at least as extreme as the observed one in the direction the alternative specifies. Mechanically it is a tail area of the null sampling distribution: for $H_0: p = 0.40$, $n = 250$, and $\hat{p} = 0.352$, the null standard deviation is $\sqrt{\frac{0.40(0.60)}{250}} \approx 0.0310$, $z \approx -1.55$, and the left-tail area is about 0.061. A one-sided alternative counts one tail, a two-sided alternative counts both and so doubles the value to about 0.121 for the same data.

Every standard misreading is the definition with its conditional clause removed. A p-value of 0.061 becomes a 6.1% chance the null is true, or a 93.9% chance the alternative is, or the probability that the results are due to chance, though the calculation already assumes chance alone. It becomes the probability of exactly this sample, though the definition says at least as extreme. The repair is the same each time: state the assumed value of $p$, the direction, and the sample size, as in if $p$ really were 0.40, about 6% of samples of 250 would give 0.352 or lower.

ASSUMING p = 0.40 is true 0.400 0.352 p-value = 0.061 if p really were 0.40, about 6% of samples of 250 would give a renewal proportion of 0.352 or LOWER
The curve exists only because the null was assumed: it is centered at 0.40 and its width uses 0.40. The shaded region is everything at least as far out as the observed value, in the direction the alternative named.
p = 0.061, read correctly IF p = 0.40, about 6% of samples of 250 would give a proportion of 0.352 or lower four readings with the IF removed 6.1% chance H0 is true reverses the condition 93.9% chance Ha is true complement of the same slip 6.1% chance it was chance chance was already assumed P(exactly this sample) the definition says AT LEAST a sentence with no IF in it is not yet an interpretation
All four errors are the same error. The p-value is computed given the null, so it can never be turned around into a probability about the null without the reverse-conditional machinery of Topic 2.6.

The work

3 ways in · any order
Lesson
p-Values

Defines the p-value with its assuming-the-null clause intact, computes it as a tail area of the null sampling distribution, shows how one-sided and two-sided alternatives change which area counts, and takes apart the four readings that drop the condition.

Skill check · 10 scenarios
Diagnostic
10-item topic check

Ten items on p-values: the probability the null is true, the probability the results are due to chance, exact-sample probabilities, and one-sided areas reported for two-sided questions. Take it cold to find your habit, or after the lesson to check it is gone.

Not started · 10 items · ~15 min
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception

Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.

Take the diagnostic to identify your misconceptions