Sampling Distributions for Sample Proportions
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optionalFor a simple random sample of size $n$, the sampling distribution of $\hat{p}$ has $\mu_{\hat{p}} = p$ and $\sigma_{\hat{p}} = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}$, and it is approximately normal when the counts are large. Three conditions carry three separate jobs: random makes $\hat{p}$ unbiased and licenses generalization, the 10% condition keeps the standard-deviation formula accurate under sampling without replacement, and $np \ge 10$ with $n(1-p) \ge 10$ delivers the normal shape. With $p = 0.60$ and $n = 100$, $\sigma_{\hat{p}} \approx 0.049$ and $P(\hat{p} > 0.65) \approx 0.154$.
The standard error gets rebuilt from the wrong parts: dividing by $n$ rather than $\sqrt{n}$, leaving $n$ out of the radical entirely, or claiming that doubling $n$ halves the spread when it takes a factor of four. And the conditions get recited rather than checked: $n \ge 30$ offered for a proportion where the large-counts condition belongs, the 10% condition cited as though it established randomness, and condition names written with none of the study's numbers attached. Each condition protects a different property, so the wrong check leaves a specific part of the answer broken.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Sampling Distributions for Sample Proportions
›
Builds the sampling distribution of a sample proportion: centered at p, spread with n under a square root, and approximately normal when the counts are large, with each of the three conditions tied to the property it protects.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on the distribution of p-hat: standard errors built from the wrong ingredients, n divided instead of rooted, n at least 30 used for a proportion, and conditions named without the study's numbers. Take it cold to find your habit, or after the lesson to check it is gone.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.