Conditional Probability
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optional ⚙︎ Open the appletConditional Lab · one shaded block, two denominators, two answers nowhere near each otherConditional probability restricts the sample space: $P(A \mid B) = \frac{P(A \text{ and } B)}{P(B)}$ counts the outcomes in both events against the size of the condition, which in a two-way table is a single row or column. Rearranged, it gives the multiplication rule $P(A \text{ and } B) = P(B) \cdot P(A \mid B)$, which is what a tree diagram encodes: multiply along a branch, add across the paths that produce the event. Within a fixed condition the conditional distribution still sums to 1, so $P(A \mid B) + P(A^c \mid B) = 1$.
The direction of the conditional is the error that costs the most. $P(A \mid B)$ and $P(B \mid A)$ share the joint numerator and divide by different totals, so a test that returns positive for 95% of people with a disease can still be wrong about most positives: with 1% prevalence, 95 true positives arrive alongside 990 false ones and $P(\text{disease} \mid \text{positive}) = \frac{95}{1085} \approx 0.088$. The related failure is dividing by the grand total instead of the condition, which converts a conditional into a joint probability and quietly changes the population the claim is about.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Conditional Probability
›
Builds conditional probability as a restricted sample space, reads it off rows and columns of a table, runs the multiplication rule through tree diagrams, and works the base-rate case where a 95% accurate test is right about 9% of its positives.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items on conditioning: the reversed conditional, the grand total slipped under a conditional, tree branches multiplied in the wrong order, and base rates ignored. Take it cold to find your habit, or after the lesson to check it is gone.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.