Fission, Fusion, and Nuclear Decay
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optional ⚙︎ Open the appletNuclear Ledger · sum a reaction down both sides to find the row that refuses to balance, then rank stability two ways and let half-lives passNuclear reactions conserve nucleon number and charge but not mass: the products of an energy-releasing reaction are lighter, and the defect leaves as energy through $E = \Delta mc^2$, with $1$ u corresponding to about $931$ MeV. Stability is ranked by binding energy per nucleon, which peaks near iron at roughly $8.8$ MeV, so moving toward that peak from either side releases energy, which is why fission works for heavy nuclei and fusion for light ones. Each half-life removes half of what remains rather than a fixed amount, and the half-life is fixed by the isotope alone.
Four errors dominate. Balancing masses across a reaction the way nucleon numbers balance, which reports zero energy released or reverses its sign. Ranking nuclei by total binding energy rather than by binding energy per nucleon, which makes uranium look most stable and makes both fission and fusion look like processes that should cost energy. Removing a fixed amount each half-life, so two half-lives leave nothing. And treating the half-life as depending on how much material is present or how long it has already sat.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Fission, Fusion, and Nuclear Decay
›
Balances nucleons and charge while taking the mass difference as released energy, ranks stability by binding energy per nucleon so one curve explains fission and fusion, and halves what remains at each half-life.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items spanning the failure modes of this topic: balancing masses across a reaction, ranking stability by total binding energy, counting a half-life down linearly, and making the half-life depend on the sample. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.