Periodic Waves
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optional ⚙︎ Open the appletPeriodic Wave Bench · measure the repeat on the position pane and on the time pane, then find which knob the wave speed listens toA displacement-against-position graph is a snapshot of the whole wave, and its repeat distance is the wavelength; a displacement-against-time graph follows one particle, and its repeat interval is the period. In $v = f\lambda$ the medium fixes the speed and the source fixes the frequency, so on a given string raising the frequency shortens the wavelength and leaves the speed alone, while crossing into a new medium pins the frequency and lets both the speed and the wavelength change. Amplitude and frequency are independent properties read off different axes: loudness tracks amplitude and pitch tracks frequency.
Three errors dominate. Reading the repeat distance on a position graph as a period, or the repeat interval on a time graph as a wavelength, which makes everything computed afterwards wrong with mismatched units. Using $v = f\lambda$ to conclude that raising the source frequency raises the wave speed, which is holding the wrong quantity fixed. And treating amplitude and frequency as one knob, so a taller curve is read as a higher pitch or a shorter wavelength.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Periodic Waves
›
Separates the position graph from the time graph, names which quantity is pinned before applying v = f lambda, and keeps loudness and pitch on their own axes.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items spanning the failure modes of this topic: reading a wavelength as a period, raising the wave speed by raising the source frequency, and hearing a taller wave as a higher note. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.