Inductance
▶︎ Watch it animatedinteractive step-through · ~3 min · optional ⚙︎ Open the appletInductor Bench · slide the current and watch L stay put, then commit to what a zero-ohm coil drops when the current changesInductance is the ratio $L = N\Phi_B/I$, and like capacitance it is fixed by geometry: for a long solenoid $L = \mu_0 n^2 A\ell$, with the current cancelled out of the derivation. Mutual inductance $M = N_2\Phi_{21}/I_1$ is the same kind of ratio between two coils. The voltage across an inductor is $V_L = L\,dI/dt$: zero at steady current, opposing a rise, driving a fall, and sustained by the changing flux rather than by any resistance, so a superconducting coil can hold volts across it. Raising the current banks $\tfrac12 LI^2$ in the field, at a density $B^2/2\mu_0$.
Three errors account for most of the trouble. Treating the inductor as something that opposes current, so a steady current is expected to drop a voltage or slowly die, and a decreasing current is expected to meet no resistance at all. Refusing a zero-resistance coil any voltage because $V = IR$ gives zero, which deletes the $L\,dI/dt$ term and makes every LR loop equation fail to balance. And letting $L$ grow with the current because the flux grew, when the flux grew because the current did and the ratio never moved.
The work
3 ways in · any order
Lesson
Inductance
›
Defines inductance as a geometric ratio and derives it for a solenoid, pins the inductor's voltage to the slope of the current in both directions, separates the back-EMF from the wire's resistance, and integrates the energy banked in the field.
Diagnostic
10-item topic check
›
Ten items spanning the failure modes of this topic: making the inductor oppose current instead of the change in current, denying a zero-resistance coil any voltage, and letting the inductance grow with the current through it. Take it cold to find which one is yours, or after the lesson to confirm it is not.
Targeted Practice
Drill a single misconception
›
Pick one of the failure modes you missed and drill it on its own. The round is adaptive: two correct in a row clears it for now and moves you to the next. Two in a row is a checkpoint, not proof: if the error resurfaces later, the misconception comes back.